[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 00:34:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 10:09:28AM -0700, Jim Busser wrote:
>> BUT if you, as a clinician, decide you better like "s/p PM insertion"
>> to be another health issue -- more power to you !
>
> To the wiki page ProgressNoteExamples I added the following. Are we in
> agreement that there is no one "right answer"?
Very much so.
> Thanks to Sebastian for "this question" (link) in the mail archive,
> which received two different answers as how it could be handled. The
> "best" answer may simply depend on what makes the most sense for how the
> clinician (or the clinician group) wishes to work.
Definitely. And GNUmed is here to facilitate that. It can't
or won't support all imaginable possibilities but rather
constrains itself to support a reasonable subset thereof
based on perceived needs at the GP and/or ambulatory care
level.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, (continued)
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, Jim Busser, 2009/04/05
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/04/05
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, Jim Busser, 2009/04/05
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/04/05
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/04/05
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, Jim Busser, 2009/04/03
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/04/03
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question,
Karsten Hilbert <=
Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/04/02
Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/04/03