|
From: | Jim Busser |
Subject: | [Gnumed-devel] EMR journal soap row type / representation "ADM" & other feedback |
Date: | Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:14:34 -0700 |
Conveniently (at least, often), when an episode name had been provided (for a new episode), this record will be sequenced after the SOAP rows within this encounter, unless more get added before this encounter is closed.
Can we, in place of "ADM", show "=" in the S O A P column, as this still respects that the row was not a traditional soap row (but is rather a clinician-entered "meta" row) resulting from some clinical evaluation?
Likewise shown among EMR Journal rows as "ADM" are the Foundational Health Issues. These had also been user (clinician) entered (when they were not imported from a legacy EMR), and could also be argued to be derived if unverified entities. They could likewise be represented with "=" in the S O A P column?
Can the other "administrative" rows such as may arise from encounters created by lab results importers (or from record activation when browsing a record) be de-emphasized in the layout by designating them in the S O A P column with an"ellipsis" (three dots) instead of "ADM"?
Can we remove the word "Foundational" from "Foundational Health Issue" in the EMR Journal and simplify its appearance to
"Health Issue: <issue name>"I noticed in the journal an appearance of "Happened... None" for a sOap row "Allergy state: unknown, unasked (date time) and even while I was not (as a user) prompted to intereact with the allergy state I am wondering why it got documented? I suppose the system may be documenting that I did not ask it however I do not like that it is implying I should have, without it having offered to help me do what it seems to have decided I ought to be doing :-)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |