gnunet-svn
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[GNUnet-SVN] [taler-merchant] branch master updated: do not use uninitia


From: gnunet
Subject: [GNUnet-SVN] [taler-merchant] branch master updated: do not use uninitialized master_pub field from 'struct Exchange', but use the initialized master_pub from keys instead (when storing wire fee data in the database), should complete #4943 implementation
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 14:30:57 +0200

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

grothoff pushed a commit to branch master
in repository merchant.

The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
     new 2d3fcf5  do not use uninitialized master_pub field from 'struct 
Exchange', but use the initialized master_pub from keys instead (when storing 
wire fee data in the database), should complete #4943 implementation
2d3fcf5 is described below

commit 2d3fcf511582a69f4ee18a671b6cb2fba2dbdff6
Author: Christian Grothoff <address@hidden>
AuthorDate: Sat Jul 22 16:10:50 2017 +0200

    do not use uninitialized master_pub field from 'struct Exchange', but use 
the initialized master_pub from keys instead (when storing wire fee data in the 
database), should complete #4943 implementation
---
 src/backend/taler-merchant-httpd_exchanges.c      | 15 +++++++++++++--
 src/backend/taler-merchant-httpd_track-transfer.c |  3 ++-
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/taler-merchant-httpd_exchanges.c 
b/src/backend/taler-merchant-httpd_exchanges.c
index a011be4..c4df9ea 100644
--- a/src/backend/taler-merchant-httpd_exchanges.c
+++ b/src/backend/taler-merchant-httpd_exchanges.c
@@ -312,7 +312,12 @@ process_wire_fees (void *cls,
   struct FeesByWireMethod *f;
   struct TALER_EXCHANGE_WireAggregateFees *endp;
   struct TALER_EXCHANGE_WireAggregateFees *af;
-
+  const struct TALER_EXCHANGE_Keys *keys;
+  const struct TALER_MasterPublicKeyP *master_pub;
+  
+  keys = TALER_EXCHANGE_get_keys (exchange->conn);
+  GNUNET_assert (NULL != keys);
+  master_pub = &keys->master_pub;
   for (f = exchange->wire_fees_head; NULL != f; f = f->next)
     if (0 == strcasecmp (wire_method,
                          f->wire_method))
@@ -349,8 +354,14 @@ process_wire_fees (void *cls,
     GNUNET_CRYPTO_hash (wire_method,
                        strlen (wire_method) + 1,
                        &h_wire_method);
+    GNUNET_log (GNUNET_ERROR_TYPE_DEBUG,
+               "Storing wire fee for `%s' and method `%s' at %s in DB; the fee 
is %s\n",
+               TALER_B2S (master_pub),
+               wire_method,
+               GNUNET_STRINGS_absolute_time_to_string (af->start_date),
+               TALER_amount2s (&af->wire_fee));
     qs = db->store_wire_fee_by_exchange (db->cls,
-                                        &exchange->master_pub,
+                                        master_pub,
                                         &h_wire_method,
                                         &af->wire_fee,
                                         &af->closing_fee,
diff --git a/src/backend/taler-merchant-httpd_track-transfer.c 
b/src/backend/taler-merchant-httpd_track-transfer.c
index 4d55b7a..f66457a 100644
--- a/src/backend/taler-merchant-httpd_track-transfer.c
+++ b/src/backend/taler-merchant-httpd_track-transfer.c
@@ -533,8 +533,9 @@ check_wire_fee (struct TrackTransferContext *rctx,
   if (0 >= qs)
   {
     GNUNET_log (GNUNET_ERROR_TYPE_WARNING,
-               "Failed to find wire fee for `%s' at %s in DB, accepting 
blindly that the fee is %s\n",
+               "Failed to find wire fee for `%s' and method `%s' at %s in DB, 
accepting blindly that the fee is %s\n",
                TALER_B2S (master_pub),
+               rctx->wire_method,
                GNUNET_STRINGS_absolute_time_to_string (execution_time),
                TALER_amount2s (wire_fee));
     return GNUNET_NO;

-- 
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
address@hidden



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]