Re: Release schedule

[Adam Fedor]

Tim Harrison wrote:
> Most people update directly from CVS, without specifying a branch, from 
> what I've seen.  So, more than likely, the community at large isn't 
> testing these branches.  I don't have any numbers on this, I can only go 
> by what I hear and see.

Ok. Perhaps I might abandon doing branches at least for gui and back, 
since they're really beta anyway...

> > Also, after much procrastination, I hope to update the upcoming
> > goals/schedule for GNUstep:
> >
> > http://www.gnustep.org/developers/schedule.html
> >
> > If you have any thoughts on what our major goals should be for the next
> > few releases, let me know.
>
>
> Might I suggest a more strict focus on making sure that the OpenStep 
> aspects of the system are complete, clean, and fully functional?  This 
> way, at least the OpenStep functionality of GNUstep could be considered 
> implemented.  Even if it isn't perfect, at least the  interfaces could 
> be final, and would not change in the future.


Well, perhaps I misunderstand, but I think that is what is mostly being 
done now, although there is a lot of talk about maintaining MacOSX 
compatibility as well. However, I don't think anyone is spending time 
writting new (MacOSX) classes, just trying to make the current ones more 
robust.

--
Adam Fedor, Digital Optics Corp.      | I'm glad I hate spinach, because
http://www.doc.com                    | if I didn't, I'd eat it, and you
                                      | know how I hate the stuff.