[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Use of libobjc from gcc 4.1 with MinGW
From: |
Helge Hess |
Subject: |
Re: Use of libobjc from gcc 4.1 with MinGW |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:30:02 +0100 |
On Mar 22, 2007, at 14:47, Xavier Glattard wrote:
An other stupid question :
why dont link _only_ gnustep-base to a static libobjc ?
Because your Objective-C code needs to access functions contained in
libobjc?
So you would not had multiple objc runtime !
In theory the gnustep-base.dll could contain the libobjc, but then it
would need to expose the libobjc API in its DLL wrapper AND you would
need to tell all your makefiles that they don't need to link libobjc.
And you would need to tell gcc/ld *not* to link libobjc
automatically. This could be the hardest part since internal
libraries of GCC have weird lookup hacks in the compiler (-L has
different semantics).
I don't think its a good idea to embed libobjc into gnustep-base.
Though I'm not 100% sure ;-)
Helge
--
Helge Hess
http://www.helgehess.eu/
- Use of libobjc from gcc 4.1 with MinGW, Xavier Glattard, 2007/03/21
- Re: Use of libobjc from gcc 4.1 with MinGW, Andrew Pinski, 2007/03/21
- Re: Use of libobjc from gcc 4.1 with MinGW, Xavier Glattard, 2007/03/21
- Re: Use of libobjc from gcc 4.1 with MinGW, Andrew Pinski, 2007/03/21
- Re: Use of libobjc from gcc 4.1 with MinGW, Xavier Glattard, 2007/03/21
- Re: Use of libobjc from gcc 4.1 with MinGW, Andrew Pinski, 2007/03/21
- Re: Use of libobjc from gcc 4.1 with MinGW, Xavier Glattard, 2007/03/21
- Re: Use of libobjc from gcc 4.1 with MinGW, Helge Hess, 2007/03/21
- Re: Use of libobjc from gcc 4.1 with MinGW, Xavier Glattard, 2007/03/22
- Re: Use of libobjc from gcc 4.1 with MinGW,
Helge Hess <=
- Re: Use of libobjc from gcc 4.1 with MinGW, Andrew Pinski, 2007/03/22
Re: Use of libobjc from gcc 4.1 with MinGW, Xavier Glattard, 2007/03/21