gnustep-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results


From: David Ayers
Subject: Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:09:06 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20070113)

Adam Fedor schrieb:
> Test results for GNUstep as of Mon Dec  3 06:34:10 EST 2007
> If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will
> be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm
> 
> If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see
> http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F
> 
> Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.3 Mon Dec  3 15:36:40 CST 2007

NSDecimalNumber.m: In function `-[NSDecimalNumber initWithBytes:objCType:]':
NSDecimalNumber.m:348: warning: implicit declaration of function `isinff'
...
../Source/./obj/libgnustep-base.so: undefined reference to `isinff'
gmake[2]: *** [obj/autogsdoc] Error 1
gmake[1]: *** [autogsdoc.all.tool.variables] Error 2
gmake[1]: Leaving directory
`/var/home/gstest/gnustep-testfarm/core/base/Tools'
gmake: *** [internal-all] Error 2


Could someone with access to a FreeBSD system check whether I need to
define something special (akin to _GNU_SOURCE) to make isinff() visible,
or let me know of FreeBSD's C-Library simply does not provide isinff?


> Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.1 Mon Dec  3 03:57:12 CET 2007
> Fail Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Mon Dec  3 01:23:28 EST 2007

Here it seems that

isnanf
isinf
isinff

are all not visible.  There must also be someway to expose the C99 macros.

Cheers,
David




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]