[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug: libobjc2 property name introspection.
From: |
Chan Maxthon |
Subject: |
Re: Bug: libobjc2 property name introspection. |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:43:56 +0800 |
Well you may have to stick to that line, as my issue is about code ported over
from OS X and use gnustep-make to build.
发自我的 iPad
在 2013-4-10,0:41,David Chisnall <address@hidden> 写道:
> Yes, that's the output I see. Your proposed compile line is obviously not
> reproduceable, because the output from gnustep-config depends on how you
> installed -make. On my machine, with libobjc2 and clang trunk, I compiled
> with:
>
> $ clang -fobjc-runtime=gnustep-1.6 ./proptest.m -lgnustep-base -fobjc-arc
> and:
> $ clang -fobjc-runtime=gnustep-1.7 ./proptest.m -lgnustep-base -fobjc-arc
>
> In both cases, it printed:
> foo
> bar
>
> David
>
> On 9 Apr 2013, at 17:35, Maxthon Chan <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> The example I gave should output two lines, "foo" and "bar", and nothing
>> else.
>>
>> 在 2013-4-10,上午12:23,David Chisnall <address@hidden> 写道:
>>
>>> To clarify:
>>>
>>> A simple test case is one that is a single file that I can compile, with no
>>> dependencies other than the runtime, and which prints some output that is
>>> obviously right or wrong, or which asset()s the correct output.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> On 9 Apr 2013, at 17:19, Maxthon Chan <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I will just copy/paste some code from my actual project. Compile without
>>>> -DGNUSTEP:
>>>
>>> [ big blob of stuff omitted ]
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 在 2013-4-10,上午12:13,David Chisnall <address@hidden> 写道:
>>>>
>>>>> Please send me a (simple) test case.
>>>>>
>>>>> David
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9 Apr 2013, at 17:10, Maxthon Chan <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> When I enumerate a class for all its properties and querying its name,
>>>>>> the name of last property is always cobbled. I have to use some "quick &
>>>>>> dirty" way (i.e add a dummy property at the end) to prevent this from
>>>>>> affecting. OS X does not have this issue, though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can anyone figure out what is wrong?
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Gnustep-dev mailing list
>>>>>> address@hidden
>>>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnustep-dev mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
>