Re: Coverity Scan for GNUstep?

[Richard Frith-Macdonald]

> On 29 Jan 2018, at 08:28, Fred Kiefer <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> re is a problem with these numbers. Coverity did only analyse about one third 
> of the Objective-C files in GNUstep base and most likely only the smaller 
> files. Coverity at the moment has issues with Objective-C protocols and only 
> works with files where there are no references to any. That means we don’t 
> know how many of the 1 million lines where actually checked for defects. The 
> number 0.01 is basically meaningless :-)

:-(

Where do I look to find out about this?
I don't think gnustep-base actually *uses* protocols much, so perhaps we can 
figure out ways to work around this limitation?