[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Coverity Scan for GNUstep?
From: |
Fred Kiefer |
Subject: |
Re: Coverity Scan for GNUstep? |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jan 2018 09:10:44 +0100 |
I just uploaded yet another scan, even though Richard is already in the process
of fixing the issues of the last one.
It looks like Coverity is ignoring the compiler annotations in [NSException
raise]. To work around this I added a Coverity specific annotation in my local
file („// covertly[+kill]„) to see if this improves the results. Currently our
defect density is 0.16 and this is already an excellent number, even though
there are a lot of false positives.
> Am 29.01.2018 um 23:41 schrieb Fred Kiefer <address@hidden>:
>
> that was the idea that I needed to get further. I disabled the
> GS_GENERIC_CLASS macro in NSObjCRuntime.h and now all the files seem to
> compile with Coverity. The new result is currently being uploaded and will
> hopefully be processed in the next few hours. With that we should have a
> better picture of our „defect rate"
- Re: Coverity Scan for GNUstep?, (continued)
- Re: Coverity Scan for GNUstep?, David Chisnall, 2018/01/25
- Re: Coverity Scan for GNUstep?, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2018/01/29
- Re: Coverity Scan for GNUstep?, Fred Kiefer, 2018/01/29
- Re: Coverity Scan for GNUstep?, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2018/01/29
- Re: Coverity Scan for GNUstep?, Ivan Vučica, 2018/01/29
- Re: Coverity Scan for GNUstep?, Fred Kiefer, 2018/01/29
- Re: Coverity Scan for GNUstep?, Wolfgang Lux, 2018/01/29
- Re: Coverity Scan for GNUstep?, Fred Kiefer, 2018/01/29
- Re: Coverity Scan for GNUstep?,
Fred Kiefer <=
Re: Coverity Scan for GNUstep?, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2018/01/15