[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnutls-dev] Is 2MB too large for self tests?
|
From: |
Werner Koch |
|
Subject: |
Re: [gnutls-dev] Is 2MB too large for self tests? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 22 Aug 2004 19:48:15 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 16:19:25 +0200, Simon Josefsson said:
>> Interesting. I'll ask the GNU "legal dept" too; just to be sure.
> Any news?
Not yet done :-(
> Do people feel this is too large? It might be that both the old and
> the new test suite are useful, if so that would enlarge the package by
> ~2.6MB (compressed).
Its just 1.2MB when repackages as bzip2 compressed tarball.
> CVS now has 'tests/pkits_*' as well, which uses the new test suite.
> Simplistic parsing of the structures, but some crypto is involved so I
FWIW, I have also started to integrate it into gnupg 1.9.
Werner
- [gnutls-dev] gnutls 1.1.15 -- (repost, for completeness, last try didn't show up), Simon Josefsson, 2004/08/14
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [gnutls-dev] Re: gnutls 1.1.15 -- (repost, for completeness, last try didn't show up), Werner Koch, 2004/08/16
- [gnutls-dev] Is 2MB too large for self tests? (was: Re: gnutls 1.1.15 -- (repost, for completeness, last try didn't show up)), Simon Josefsson, 2004/08/22
- Re: [gnutls-dev] Is 2MB too large for self tests? (was: Re: gnutls 1.1.15 -- (repost, for completeness, last try didn't show up)), Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/08/22
- [gnutls-dev] Re: Is 2MB too large for self tests?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/08/22
- Re: [gnutls-dev] Is 2MB too large for self tests?,
Werner Koch <=
- Message not available
- [gnutls-dev] Re: Is 2MB too large for self tests?, Werner Koch, 2004/08/23
- [gnutls-dev] Re: Is 2MB too large for self tests?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/08/23