Re: [gnutls-dev] Consider 2.1.6 a release candidate for 2.2!

[Simon Josefsson]

Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <address@hidden> writes:

> On Friday 30 November 2007, Werner Koch wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:25, address@hidden said:
>> > Ah, I see.  If we wait for libgcrypt to become stable (which was only a
>> > few weeks away if I understand correctly), will it be uploaded into
>>
>> Well, you force me to release it sooner than expected.  I will do a new
>> devel release the next days and ask people to test it on several
>> platforms - in particular on VIA to see that I did not broke anything.
>>
>> A final release can then be done in ~10 days which would fit your
>> release plan I hope.
>
> Maybe we can depend on libgcrypt 1.2.x temporarily. The functionality that we 
> lose is the DSA2 signing, which is not so critical to be included now. 

Yes, I think this is better, if the release schedule libgcrypt is a
problem.  I see you committed this, thanks.  GnuTLS 2.2 will only need
libgcrypt 1.2.x then.

/Simon