Re: Memory leak in _gnutls_mpi_dprint_lz (possibly _gnutls_mpi_dprint)

[Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos]

Sam Varshavchik wrote:

> But given that there still does not seem to be an explicit check in
> _gnutls_mpi_dprint_lz() for a previously-allocated buffer, I'm now
> wondering what happens if a rehandshake occurs in a middle of a session.
> I'll try to write some code to test this, against 2.4.0, and see what
> happens.

You're right, there might be an issue there. I've added some check to
protect against this case.

regards,
Nikos