[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, an
From: |
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos |
Subject: |
Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:02:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) |
Joe Orton wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 01:54:43PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> On Sat 2008-11-22 03:05:03 -0500, Joe Orton wrote:
>> [0 address@hidden cdtemp.oNUHIC]$ svn co
>> https://foo.example.org/svn/monkey/trunk/gorilla
>> svn: OPTIONS of 'https://foo.example.org/svn/monkey/trunk/gorilla:
>> Could not read status line: SSL error: Decryption has failed.
>> (https://foo.example.org)
>> [1 address@hidden cdtemp.oNUHIC]$
>>
>> But it's still not just going ahead with the checkout the way it does
>> when i use the openssl version of libneon. Can i give you more
>> detailed debugging info somehow?
>
> Interesting, thanks for trying that out. I'm not sure what else neon
> could do to make this work correctly so I think further diagnosis based
> on packet traces will be needed. I can try to work on that sometime in
> the coming week, with luck.
> It might be useful to modify gnutls-cli to call gnutls_rehandshake() in
> the same fashion as my patch to neon, to get some debugging traces from
> GnuTLS, if you wanted to try that.
The git version of gnutls-cli (both in main and 2.6 branches) support
this behavior.
regards,
Nikos
- confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2008/11/20
- Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2008/11/21
- Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Joe Orton, 2008/11/21
- Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2008/11/21
- Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Joe Orton, 2008/11/21
- Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2008/11/22
- Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Joe Orton, 2008/11/22
- Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2008/11/22
- Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Joe Orton, 2008/11/22
- Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce,
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <=
- Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Joe Orton, 2008/11/28
- Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2008/11/29
Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2008/11/21
Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2008/11/21
Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Joe Orton, 2008/11/21
gnutls-cli return codes [was: Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce], Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2008/11/21