[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: solutions
From: |
Werner Koch |
Subject: |
Re: solutions |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:03:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) |
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:56, address@hidden said:
> function is passed the OID for CN, it has to return the information,
> otherwise you'll get other problems if you return an error saying that
> there is no CN field.
Better an error than doing something not intended.
> But if we use the RFC 2253 formatting, all things are safe.
Just make sure that parsing the BER of all arcs is fine and does not
overflow. I consider an arc which can't be represented by a 32 bit
value as fishy and return an error (i.e. the mentioned special OID).
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Auschnahme regelt ein Bundeschgesetz.
- Re: solutions, (continued)
- Re: solutions, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2009/08/05
- Re: solutions, Simon Josefsson, 2009/08/06
- please test imminent 2.8.x release, Simon Josefsson, 2009/08/06
- Re: please test imminent 2.8.x release, Tim Kosse, 2009/08/07
- Re: please test imminent 2.8.x release, Simon Josefsson, 2009/08/10
- Re: please test imminent 2.8.x release, Tomas Hoger, 2009/08/10
- Re: please test imminent 2.8.x release, Simon Josefsson, 2009/08/10
- Re: please test imminent 2.8.x release, Tomas Mraz, 2009/08/10
Re: solutions, Werner Koch, 2009/08/04
- Re: solutions, Simon Josefsson, 2009/08/04
- Re: solutions,
Werner Koch <=