Re: gnutls 2.8.6 release candidate

[Dagobert Michelsen]

Hi Simon,

Am 20.01.2010 um 11:12 schrieb Simon Josefsson:
> I think we have enough fixes on the 2.8.x trunk, and the last 2.8.x
> release was over two months ago, so it is time for 2.8.6.  Please test
> this snapshot as if it were the new release:
>
> http://daily.josefsson.org/gnutls-2.8/gnutls-2.8-20100120.tar.bz2
>
> I'll release sometime next week.  Build tests on Solaris/HP are very
> welcome, I'll see if I can find time to do them myself.

This issue about gpg-error and lnsl we talked about has not been  
resolved
in this release, but in 2.9.9:

Am 05.11.2009 um 16:35 schrieb Simon Josefsson:
> Dagobert Michelsen <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > Am 05.11.2009 um 16:17 schrieb Simon Josefsson:
> > > Dagobert Michelsen <address@hidden> writes:
> > >
> > > > > -  AC_LIB_HAVE_LINKFLAGS(gcrypt,, [#include <gcrypt.h>],
> > > > > +  AC_LIB_HAVE_LINKFLAGS([gcrypt], [gpg-error], [#include
> > > > > <gcrypt.h>],
> > > > >   [enum gcry_cipher_algos i = GCRY_CIPHER_CAMELLIA128])
> > > > > if test "$ac_cv_libgcrypt" != yes; then
> > > > >   AC_MSG_ERROR([[
> > > > > --
> > > > > 1.6.5.2
> > > >
> > > > Yes, this solves the problem with the missing libgpg-error. Now  
> > > > only
> > > > the -lsocket -lnsl issue needs to be resolved :-)
> > >
> > > Great.  The -lnsl issue could be fixed by using more recent gnulib
> > > here.
> >
> > It would be great if you had an updated tarball of the release-to- 
> > come
> > will all known errors fixed so I can verify it.
>
> Of 2.8.x or 2.9.x?  I'll see if I can push out a 2.9.x release today.
>
> /Simon


Best regards

  -- Dago