[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pkcs1-pad self-check fails?
From: |
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos |
Subject: |
Re: pkcs1-pad self-check fails? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:14:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) |
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> No I don't. I never had. Maybe we should make this test fail when
>> datefudge is not detected?
>> Otherwise we might miss it in the future (as I missed it now).
>
> Requiring datefudge will break builds for almost everyone, and the tool
> doesn't exist on some platforms which makes it impossible to build
> GnuTLS successfully on those platforms. I reverted this so the test is
> just skipped if datefudge is not available.
But then the test is as good as not being there... Noone will actually
run it. I don't find it so bad to require a program for the "make
check" to complete.
- pkcs1-pad self-check fails?, Simon Josefsson, 2010/03/16
- Re: pkcs1-pad self-check fails?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2010/03/16
- Re: pkcs1-pad self-check fails?, Simon Josefsson, 2010/03/16
- Re: pkcs1-pad self-check fails?, Simon Josefsson, 2010/03/17
- Re: pkcs1-pad self-check fails?,
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <=
- Re: pkcs1-pad self-check fails?, Simon Josefsson, 2010/03/17
- Re: pkcs1-pad self-check fails?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2010/03/17
- Re: pkcs1-pad self-check fails?, Simon Josefsson, 2010/03/17
- datefudge and faketime [was: Re: pkcs1-pad self-check fails?], Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2010/03/17
- Re: datefudge and faketime, Simon Josefsson, 2010/03/18
- Re: datefudge and faketime, Andreas Metzler, 2010/03/18
- Re: datefudge and faketime, Simon Josefsson, 2010/03/21