gnutls-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: implicit declaration of function 'scm_c_issue_deprecation_warning'


From: Simon Josefsson
Subject: Re: implicit declaration of function 'scm_c_issue_deprecation_warning'
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 13:30:25 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux)

Ludo, do you have any idea?  By the function name, it looks like this
was somehow intended, but I'm not sure what the origin of the problem
is.  Maybe the guile stuff still use the non-string based priority
functions?

/Simon

Andreas Metzler <address@hidden> writes:

> Hello,
>
> building 3.0.x triggers an implicit-function-declaration warning in
> the guile code. (The respective warning is present in 3.0.0 to 3.0.9)
>
> -----------------------------------------
> make[5]: Entering directory `/tmp/GNUTLS/gnutls-3.0.9/guile/src'
> \
> #       source='core.c' object='guile_gnutls_v_2_la-core.lo' libtool=yes 
> /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99
> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..  -I../../lib/includes -I../../lib/includes
> -I../../extra/includes -I../.. -I.  -Wno-strict-prototypes -I../../gl
> -I../../gl -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat
> -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security -Wall -c -o
> guile_gnutls_v_2_la-core.lo `test -f 'core.c' || echo './'`core.c
> libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
> -I. -I../.. -I../../lib/includes -I../../lib/includes
> -I../../extra/includes -I../.. -I. -Wno-strict-prototypes -I../../gl
> -I../../gl -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat
> -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security -Wall -c core.c -fPIC -DPIC
> -o .libs/guile_gnutls_v_2_la-core.o
> In file included from core.c:506:0:
> priorities.i.c: In function 'scm_gnutls_set_session_cipher_priority_x':
> priorities.i.c:11:3: warning: implicit declaration of function
> scm_c_issue_deprecation_warning' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> -----------------------------------------
>
> cu andreas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]