Re: Documentation on W32

[Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos]

On 09/15/2012 11:49 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 11:18:48 +0200
>> From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <address@hidden>
>> Cc: address@hidden
>>
>> Is there any reason for not using mingw64-32 instead?
> 
> Why would a package force its users into using only one particular
> brand of runtime?


The question is to determine whether there is a reason to actually
support mingw32 given the fact that's broken with several functions
we need.

regards,
Nikos