[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Feb 2015 23:26:03 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Greg Troxel <address@hidden>:
> Well, I guess if it was just what NTP needed, that would be one thing,
> but it seems to leave more and more and run out. I'm not really sure,
> but I've found 6-8 each on machines where the tests failed.
There used to be only 4. Then we had a bug report from a person who was
actually using multiple PPS devices and was confused because he couldn't
have both an in-line segment and PPS segment for all of them.
So I boosted the number of NTP segments allocated to twice the max number
of devices, which by default equals 8.
This is a recent change and can easily be rolled back if I have misunderstood
thwe interface.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, (continued)
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/03
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/03
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Greg Troxel, 2015/02/03
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/03
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/03
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/03
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/04
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/04
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/04
Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/03