Re: [gpsd-dev] [PATCH 4/4] Parallelizes gps-regress and gps-makeregress.

[Hal Murray]

address@hidden said:
> I personally agree, but since the history indicates that the self-cleaning
> test was considered desirable when it was implemented, I didn't want to
> change that.  Changing the meaning of 'check' might be controversial, but
> adding a new target that omits the 'testclean' isn't. 

I want something so I can run a series of tests and compare the log files.  

I don't care if that's delete stuff after a run so the next run has to 
rebuild the same stuff as the previous or if there is a preliminary step that 
will build everything that following runs might need.

What should I do?



-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.