[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] bug in GNU troff?
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] bug in GNU troff? |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 23:22:07 +0100 (CET) |
> > What is the behaviour of UNIX troff?
>
> Identical. It is, perhaps, illustrative to consider a slightly modified
> example:
>
> a\tb
> .br
> a\c
> \t\c
> b
> .br
> aa\c
> \t\c
> bb
>
> Which gives:
>
> a b
> a b
> aa bb
Does this behaviour make sense? I would like to make this work as
expected (if not in compatibility mode).
Objections? Do you know any package which relies on this strange
feature?
Werner
- [Groff] bug in GNU troff?, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/01/18
- Re: [Groff] bug in GNU troff?, Larry Jones, 2001/01/19
- Re: [Groff] bug in GNU troff?, Ralph Corderoy, 2001/01/20
- Re: [Groff] bug in GNU troff?,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [Groff] bug in GNU troff?, Ralph Corderoy, 2001/01/20
- Re: [Groff] bug in GNU troff?, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/01/21
- Re: [Groff] bug in GNU troff?, Ralph Corderoy, 2001/01/21
- Re: [Groff] bug in GNU troff?, Jon Snader, 2001/01/22
- Re: [Groff] bug in GNU troff?, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/01/22
- Re: [Groff] bug in GNU troff?, Ralph Corderoy, 2001/01/22