[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] german localization
From: |
Erich Hoffmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] german localization |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jan 2002 23:36:20 +0100 (CET) |
Gruess Dich, Werner!
Thanks for the advice & the source files! I gave it a first try, being
an eternal novice, and everything seems to work fine.
In some items I'd like to know more.
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>.do hcode ä ä Ä ä
>.do hla de
Is the .do hcode essential? I'm inserting an "ä" and Groff realizes it.
Meanwhile I insert a \[Fo], Groff doesn't realize it and just prints two
"<"; but then I make a digraph in Vim {«} ( C-K < < ), and that is
recognized and printed.
Then, what means the ".do hla de"?
>PS: In case you are producing a hyphenation file for the new
> orthography please mail it to me.
This is not totally out of range. Where can I read more about
how to do it? I don't understand your file, but it works well. The
roff documentation I have is very terse. I'd like to read something
more verbose...
Thanks again, and Gruesse,
erich.
- [Groff] german localization, Erich Hoffmann, 2002/01/13
- Re: [Groff] german localization, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/01/13
- Re: [Groff] german localization,
Erich Hoffmann <=
- Re: [Groff] german localization, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/01/14
- Re: [Groff] german localization, Erich Hoffmann, 2002/01/15
- Re: [Groff] german localization, Bernd Warken, 2002/01/15
- Re: [Groff] german localization, Ted Harding, 2002/01/16
- Re: [Groff] german localization, Bernd Warken, 2002/01/16
- Re: [Groff] german localization, Ted Harding, 2002/01/16
- Re: [Groff] german localization, Erich Hoffmann, 2002/01/16
- Re: [Groff] german localization, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/01/17
- Re: [Groff] german localization, Sigfrid Lundberg, Netlab, 2002/01/17
- Re: [Groff] german localization, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/01/17