[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL
From: |
James J. Ramsey |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:33:45 -0800 (PST) |
--- Jorgen Grahn <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri Feb 7 06:00:51 2003,
> address@hidden wrote:
> ...
> So there should be a class of -ms documents out
> there which don't pair PO and
> .po -- maybe they just want slightly more narrow
> pages, centered on the paper.
> Apparently, these will not render as expected using
> groff.
>
> I wish I had the guts to provide a patch...
I attached a patch. Apply by cd'ing into the directory
where s.tmac lies and type "patch < s.tmac.diff".
The fix is actually really simple; just 1) move the
line ".nr PO \\n(.o" outside of the @init macro to
somewhere above any of macro definitions in s.tmac,
and 2) remove the extra backslash in front of \n(.o. I
tried it out and it seems to work fine.
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
s.tmac.diff
Description: s.tmac.diff
- [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, James J. Ramsey, 2003/02/05
- RE: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Ted Harding, 2003/02/06
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Jorgen Grahn, 2003/02/06
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Ralph Corderoy, 2003/02/07
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, James J. Ramsey, 2003/02/07
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Ralph Corderoy, 2003/02/07
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Jorgen Grahn, 2003/02/08
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL,
James J. Ramsey <=
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/02/27
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Larry Kollar, 2003/02/27