Re: [PATCH] gptsync

grub-devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] gptsync

From:	Peter Cros
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] gptsync
Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:56:38 +1000

On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Vladimir Serbinenko <address@hidden> wrote:

About compatibiliy: hybrid MBR is against specifications - it's a trick to boot legacy OS. So the only compatibility you can speak about is the ability to boot a legacy OS of your choice.

That is exactly what I was referring to.

The ability to control the ordering of partitions was attractive, not a problem.

I will leave it there thanks.

--
Cros (pxw)

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[PATCH] gptsync, Vladimir Serbinenko, 2009/04/19
- Re: [PATCH] gptsync, Peter Cros, 2009/04/20
  - Re: [PATCH] gptsync, Vladimir Serbinenko, 2009/04/20
    - Re: [PATCH] gptsync, Peter Cros, 2009/04/21
    - Re: [PATCH] gptsync, Vladimir Serbinenko, 2009/04/21
    - Re: [PATCH] gptsync, Peter Cros, 2009/04/21
    - Re: [PATCH] gptsync, Isaac Dupree, 2009/04/21
    - Re: [PATCH] gptsync, Vladimir Serbinenko, 2009/04/21
    - Re: [PATCH] gptsync, Vladimir Serbinenko, 2009/04/21
    - Re: [PATCH] gptsync, Peter Cros <=

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] gptsync
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Split #2: parser/reader separation
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] gptsync
Next by thread: [PATCH]: grub: Handle the case where the root node has size-cells but not address-cells.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread