[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: merging of gettext branch
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: merging of gettext branch |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:40:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:18:35AM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> If it doesn't hurt to support them, then we should.
> BTW it's
> file = grub_gzfile_open (argv[0], 1);
> actually. But what with seeking in .gz ? Is it efficient?
Let's enable it in the code, but not make the user scripts use it
untill someone has time to verify efficiency.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- merging of gettext branch, Carles Pina i Estany, 2009/11/21
- Re: merging of gettext branch, Carles Pina i Estany, 2009/11/21
- Re: merging of gettext branch, Robert Millan, 2009/11/21
- Re: merging of gettext branch, Carles Pina i Estany, 2009/11/22
- Re: merging of gettext branch, Carles Pina i Estany, 2009/11/22
- Re: merging of gettext branch, Carles Pina i Estany, 2009/11/22
- Re: merging of gettext branch, Robert Millan, 2009/11/22
- Re: merging of gettext branch, Carles Pina i Estany, 2009/11/22