guile-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Guile-commits] 01/01: Fixed bug: ~N mishandles small nanoseconds value


From: Andy Wingo
Subject: [Guile-commits] 01/01: Fixed bug: ~N mishandles small nanoseconds value
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:14:00 -0400 (EDT)

wingo pushed a commit to branch master
in repository guile.

commit 1978085b2208e71de5e7ba28582295c17c8053d5
Author: Andrew Moss <address@hidden>
Date:   Mon Mar 27 11:58:29 2017 -0400

    Fixed bug: ~N mishandles small nanoseconds value
    
    Fixes <http://bugs.gnu.org/26261>.
    Reported by Zefram <address@hidden>.
    
    * module/srfi/srfi-19.scm ("define directives"): N padding increased from 7 
to 9
    
    * test-suite/tests/srfi-19.test ("date->string"): New test.
---
 module/srfi/srfi-19.scm       | 2 +-
 test-suite/tests/srfi-19.test | 5 +++++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/module/srfi/srfi-19.scm b/module/srfi/srfi-19.scm
index 795ad50..1b795f3 100644
--- a/module/srfi/srfi-19.scm
+++ b/module/srfi/srfi-19.scm
@@ -1063,7 +1063,7 @@
                (newline port)))
    (cons #\N (lambda (date pad-with port)
                (display (padding (date-nanosecond date)
-                                      pad-with 7)
+                                      pad-with 9)
                         port)))
    (cons #\p (lambda (date pad-with port)
                (display (locale-am-string/pm (date-hour date)) port)))
diff --git a/test-suite/tests/srfi-19.test b/test-suite/tests/srfi-19.test
index d63e622..534cd7c 100644
--- a/test-suite/tests/srfi-19.test
+++ b/test-suite/tests/srfi-19.test
@@ -175,6 +175,11 @@ incomplete numerical tower implementation.)"
       (equal? "Sun Jun 05 18:33:00+0200 2005"
               (date->string date))))
 
+  (pass-if "date->string pads small nanoseconds values correctly"
+    (let* ((date (make-date 99999999 5 34 12 26 3 2017 0)))
+      (equal? "099999999"
+              (date->string date "~N"))))
+
   ;; check time comparison procedures
   (let* ((time1 (make-time time-monotonic 0 0))
          (time2 (make-time time-monotonic 0 0))



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]