[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: goops C interface
From: |
Bruce Korb |
Subject: |
Re: goops C interface |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:37:45 -0700 |
Eric Moore wrote:
> That opens 2 questions I'll put up for comment :)
>
> 1) do people prefer some kind of giant varargs style function that
> defines a class, or one that takes a struct that defines it?
Varargs were rather ill-conceived. Use structs, please. :-)
> 2) should the API deal in SCM values (since a goops object can by
> default hold any value) or C values (like the fdi.c and snarfing
> system does)
Both. Let the caller select whichever is more convenient.
Re: goops C interface, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/10/25
- Re: goops C interface, Eric Moore, 2000/10/27
- Re: goops C interface, Michael Livshin, 2000/10/27
- Re: goops C interface,
Bruce Korb <=
- Re: goops C interface, Carl R. Witty, 2000/10/27
- Re: goops C interface, Dirk Herrmann, 2000/10/27
- Re: goops C interface, Dale P. Smith, 2000/10/27
- Re: goops C interface, Michael Livshin, 2000/10/28