[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: API for introduction of bindings
From: |
kxn30 |
Subject: |
Re: API for introduction of bindings |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 11:22:48 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) Emacs/21.0.93 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At 17 Dec 2000 20:00:38 +0100,
Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
>
> I suggest that we instead focus on the problem of dividing the current
> set of bindings into a nice hierarchy of modules, like
> "(core safe-r5rs)", "(core r5rs)", etc. (I think Maciej and Jim had a
> preliminary proposal, Maciej? Jim?)
I'd prefer modules like "(core list)", "(core string)", etc. according
to their functionality rather than standards. We can build standard
modules like "(scheme r5rs)" by importing the core modules and exporting
necessary bindings, right?
-- Kei
- scm_system_environment, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/12/15
- Re: scm_system_environment, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/12/15
- scm_system_environment - OK, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/12/16
- Re: scm_system_environment - OK, Dirk Herrmann, 2000/12/17
- Re: scm_system_environment - OK, Marius Vollmer, 2000/12/17
- Re: scm_system_environment - OK, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/12/17
- API for introduction of bindings, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/12/17
- Re: API for introduction of bindings, Dirk Herrmann, 2000/12/18
- Re: API for introduction of bindings,
kxn30 <=
- Re: API for introduction of bindings, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/12/18
- Re: API for introduction of bindings, Michael Livshin, 2000/12/18
- Re: API for introduction of bindings, Martin Grabmueller, 2000/12/18