|
From: | Matthias Koeppe |
Subject: | Re: [Patch] CVS-Guile compilation problems |
Date: | 15 Feb 2001 16:46:54 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.6 |
Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes: > Would it suffice to just use this? > > next_symbol: > ; > } > > "(void)0" looks strange. I don't think that a singleton ";" is a C statement. That's why one has to write `do { ... } while (0)' in all these preprocessor macros -- just to avoid a singleton ";". I use (void)0 all the time as a no-op expression. It's just as strange as C is. -- Matthias Köppe -- http://www.math.uni-magdeburg.de/~mkoeppe
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |