[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Documenting debug facilities
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: Documenting debug facilities |
Date: |
01 May 2001 19:02:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
>>>>> "Neil" == Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
Neil> I'd like to improve the documentation for how Guile handles
Neil> errors, including things like `stack-catch', `make-stack',
Neil> `backtrace' etc. My initial survey indicates that doing
Neil> this properly would naturally pull in a whole load of other
Neil> stuff, including debug objects, memoized objects, the
Neil> debugging evaluator, frames, using the debugger
Neil> (breakpoints? - do they work?), and so on. (All of which is
Neil> currently documented very sparingly.)
Neil> This would be fun to do, but I'd like to know whether all
Neil> this stuff is stable enough to make it worthwhile?
I've not yet had any response at all for this question. If anyone has
any idea of the answer, I'd appreciate hearing it.
Does anyone regularly use the Guile debugger, for example?
Neil
- Re: Documenting debug facilities,
Neil Jerram <=