[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: size_t & unsigned long
From: |
Masao Uebayashi |
Subject: |
Re: size_t & unsigned long |
Date: |
Sat, 12 May 2001 00:28:58 +0900 |
Hello,
> Another point: We have a type scm_sizet (which, IMO, should better be
> renamed to scm_size_t whenver we fell masochist enough for such a change),
> the purpose of which does not seem to be too clearly defined. In which
> situations should we use this type? What is the difference to size_t?
Hmm, I've been thinking the same thing while reading libguile/unif.c.
I think that one scm_*_size_t should be prepared for each purpose so
that the intention be clearer.
I bet one didn't know what she/he was doing if 'long' is used instead
of 'size_t'. :)
Masao
---
Masao Uebayashi <address@hidden> --- We like raw eggs.