[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm? |
Date: |
15 May 2001 02:05:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.102 |
Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
> Hmm. Given today's mood, I tend to lean toward being strict and
> requiring people to have use-modules statements for *everything*
> that's not srfi-0.
Yes. But, it also feels kinda unclean to require people to test for
Guile and then load the modules. It would be better to have a mode
where people can write protable code while only referring to the
SRFIs.
Do the SRFIs themselves provide any inside how cond-expand should
behave in implementations that can load SRFIs on demand? Should
cond-expand do the demand loading?
- Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/05/10
- Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/10
- Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/10
- Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/05/11
- Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?, Neil Jerram, 2001/05/11
- Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/11
- Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/05/14
- Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/14
- Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?,
Marius Vollmer <=
- Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/14
- Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/14
- Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/05/15
- Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/15