[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t |
Date: |
26 May 2001 09:29:49 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:
> currently, by the configure script (it tries `long', `long long' and
> `int. in general the new C standard has types like int32_t, int64_t
> etc., so maybe we could try them too).
>
> C is kind of messy.
:>
In general, I suspect that since you'll never know which intN_t is the
right type on a given machine, we may just need to define our own
type(s) and change their definitions whenever appropriate.
--
Rob Browning <address@hidden> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
- scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/25
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/25
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Michael Livshin, 2001/05/25
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Jacques A. Vidrine, 2001/05/26
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/30
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/31
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/31