[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer
From: |
Matthias Koeppe |
Subject: |
Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer |
Date: |
08 Jun 2001 16:07:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.6 |
Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:
> Matthias Koeppe <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > The new de-awk-ified snarfing scheme looks good to me. However, a
> > preprocessor portability problem remains. The preprocessor of the Sun
> > Forte compilers still puts whitespace into different places. This
> > results in empty DOC and X files.
>
> please try the latest CVS.
I'm getting "bad snarf cookie" if the following line is fed into
guile_filter_doc_snarfage.
^ ^ { ^ ^ fname . "acons" ^ ^ type . primitive ^ ^ location "alist.c" . 60 ^ ^
arglist . ( SCM key , SCM value , SCM alist ) ^ ^ argsig 3 0 0 ^ ^ ( "Adds a
new key-value pair to @var{alist}. A new pair is\n" "created whose car is
@var{key} and whose cdr is @var{value}, and the\n" "pair is consed onto
@var{alist}, and the new list is returned. This\n" "function is @emph{not}
destructive; @var{alist} is not modified." ) ^ ^ }
--
Matthias Köppe -- http://www.math.uni-magdeburg.de/~mkoeppe
- Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/08
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/08
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/08
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer,
Matthias Koeppe <=
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/20
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/20
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/21
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/21
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/25
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/25