[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t |
Date: |
14 Jun 2001 21:12:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.102 |
Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:
> On 14 Jun 2001, Marius Vollmer wrote:
>
> > Err, what was the reason again for making scm_t_bits unsigned?
>
> The reason is, that it is basically a raw bit structure, which does not
> have any sign information. Signedness is an issue that only comes up
> _after_ the type information has been extracted.
Yep, that's enough of a reason. I just committed the change. Onto
the renaming...
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, (continued)
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/06/11
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Jacques A. Vidrine, 2001/06/11
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/11
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/13
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Jacques A. Vidrine, 2001/06/13
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/13
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Rob Browning, 2001/06/14
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/06/14
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t,
Marius Vollmer <=