Re: SCM_CALL_N

[Neil Jerram]

>>>>> "Dirk" == Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:

    Dirk> But, I have always had problems to understand the way
    Dirk> parameters have to be passed to scm_apply.  Therefore, I
    Dirk> think Keisuke does bring up a point which could actually
    Dirk> need improvement.

Yes, I agree with you here.  I have problems understanding this too;
hence my message asking about the reasoning behind scm_listofnull.
But I would prefer to improve the scm_apply calling convention than to
hide the whole scm_apply call.

I'm afraid I don't understand it well enough yet to suggest what that
improvement might be, though.

        Neil