Re: string-map arg order

[Martin Grabmueller]

> From: Alex Shinn <address@hidden>
> Date: 21 Aug 2001 20:05:50 -0400
> 
> Is there a reason for the order of string-map to be
> 
>   (string-map str proc)
> 
> rather than as specified in the SRFI
> 
>   (string-map proc str)
> 
> ?  Assuming this is just a bug, attached are patches to the source and
> test files.

Could somebody please apply this patch, it looks okay?  I am a bit
busy currently...

I have introduced these bugs because I was once working with a
non-final version of the SRFI document, and that contained this and
some other bugs.  Sorry for that.

Thanks and best regards,
  'martin