|
From: | Neil Jerram |
Subject: | address@hidden (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)] Re: elisp test case question |
Date: | 08 Mar 2002 12:33:47 +0000 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Hi Richard, I've recently added a prototype Emacs Lisp translator to Guile. Many of its names (for modules, functions etc.) use the abbreviation "elisp". Thomas Bushnell has suggested there might be important trademark reasons for _not_ using "elisp", or at least that there were such reasons in the past. Can you decide whether those reasons are still important, and therefore whether I should change "elisp" everywhere to "emacs-lisp"? Thanks, Neil
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: elisp test case question User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes: > I wonder if the following test case in the elisp test suite is OK: It's probably no longer *that* important, but there were important trademark reasons for not calling Emacs Lisp by the name "elisp" in the past, and I think we should continue to avoid it in official things. However, RMS is the real arbiter here. Thomas _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list address@hidden http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |