Re: Bug Reports for 1.6 Release Candidates

[Rob Browning]

Evan Prodromou <address@hidden> writes:

> I'd recommend keeping the BUGS file for now, and maybe switching
> over to a more civilized bug-tracker after the 1.6 release.

ABSOLUTELY.

Just wanted to make sure no one thought I was talking about short-term
changes here :> For 1.6, the BUGS and TODO files will do quite nicely.
I was just musing about things we might want to do later, and I don't
know that we'd ever do some of the fancier stuff.

I do think that we should probably use the TODO file to list the BUGS
that are release critical in the per-release section(s).  Ideally
looking at the TODO should give you a complete overview of what has to
be done.

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD