[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Handling BUGS.
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: Handling BUGS. |
Date: |
22 Mar 2002 09:03:31 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
>>>>> "Rob" == Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
Rob> Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
>> All sounds good to me, but how do we indicate that a bug has been
>> fixed in one tree but not in another?
Rob> Just change it's "affects:" field. i.e. you could have
Rob> affects: 1.4 1.6 1.7
Rob> and when it's fixed in 1.6, just delete it from the line. The only
Rob> time a bug would move to resolved is if it's been fixed in *all*
Rob> trees. In this first, fairly simplistic approach, I mostly just
Rob> figured resolved as a place old bugs go to die to at least *somewhat*
Rob> reduce the inevitable clutter we'll have in active. In the long term,
Rob> pumping this stuff into postgres via guile-pg or similar may be the
Rob> way to go, but that's a problem for our future selves :>
That sounds fine.
Neil