Re: define and modules

[Marius Vollmer]

Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:

> Great.  However, currently, guile's handling of defines is buggy or at
> least in contrast to R5RS.  Changing it would break existing code as shown
> in the following two examples:

I see.  I'd say we don't need to slavishly follow R5RS here since R5RS
does not talk about modules. And we don't need to keep our current,
mostly accidental semantics either.  So there is opportunity to do the
Right Thing...

-- 
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3  331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405