[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: memoization and conditional defines
From: |
Clinton Ebadi |
Subject: |
Re: memoization and conditional defines |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 15:54:19 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.2 |
> I don't care how memoization works. I understand there are
> optimization issues. Optimizing isn't important to me, or
> I would not use an interpretive language as my "extension
> language". If you add a disabling mechanism, then you'll
> have the best of all worlds. You can memoize/optimize to
> your heart's content, and I'll disable it for my purposes.
> If that is not practical and Guile becomes, essentially,
> an semi-compiled language with constraints on where
> defines may happen, then my goose will be cooked.
Not to mention how Guile wouldn't be Scheme anymore. Why can't code be
memiozied and compiled incrementally?
--
http://unknownlamer.org
Truth lies in loneliness
When hope is long gone by
Re: memoization and conditional defines, Rob Browning, 2002/11/07
Re: memoization and conditional defines, Marius Vollmer, 2002/11/17