Re: setgroups

[Marius Vollmer]

address@hidden (Paul Jarc) writes:

> > If I'm not mistaken, setgroups might or might not be available on a
> > given system.  We can test for it in configure and optionally define
> > it in posix.c (or maybe elsewhere since it's not posix...), but then
> > what?
> 
> Is the situation somehow different from that for getgroups?  I was
> just about to (try to) make a patch that would add setgroups similarly
> to how getgroups is done.

Yes, I think we should handle setgroups like the other optional
functions, even if there are better ways.  Consistency is more
important here.

-- 
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3  331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405