[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The load path
From: |
Greg Troxel |
Subject: |
Re: The load path |
Date: |
05 Nov 2004 14:19:01 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
> First off, the load path for a guile in /usr/bin/guile doesn't
> include /usr/local.
Yes. I am not sure whether it is good to single out /usr/local, tho.
There might be any number of directories that people could reasonable
expect to be in the load path, such as /opt/<package>/guile for a
Guile using <package>.
>From reading this, I don't follow the direction of the current thread.
Perhaps it would be good to articulate what ought to work that doesn't
now. The only thing I see is a way to install guile in one prefix, a
module in another, and then to somehow configure that second prefix's
share/guile to be searched by default by use-modules, load etc.
One could also want some code in the new module to be run for any
invocation of guile, but it's not clear that's a good idea as it more
or less violates the basic language definition and the provided
definition of that's in the (guile user) module.
--
Greg Troxel <address@hidden>
- Re: The load path, (continued)
- Re: The load path, Rob Browning, 2004/11/05
- Re: The load path, Paul Jarc, 2004/11/05
- Re: The load path, Rob Browning, 2004/11/05
- Re: The load path, Paul Jarc, 2004/11/06
- Re: The load path, Rob Browning, 2004/11/06
- Re: The load path, Rob Browning, 2004/11/06
Re: The load path, Rob Browning, 2004/11/05
Re: The load path, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/11/05
Re: The load path,
Greg Troxel <=
- Re: The load path, Neil Jerram, 2004/11/05
- Re: The load path, Rob Browning, 2004/11/06
- Re: The load path, Andreas Vögele, 2004/11/06
- Re: The load path, Neil Jerram, 2004/11/06
- Re: The load path, Rob Browning, 2004/11/06
- Re: The load path, Neil Jerram, 2004/11/07
- Re: The load path, Rob Browning, 2004/11/07
- Re: The load path, Paul Jarc, 2004/11/09
Re: The load path, Andy Wingo, 2004/11/11
Re: The load path, Greg Troxel, 2004/11/11