[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stack calibration
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: Stack calibration |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Oct 2008 23:53:03 +0100 |
Hi Ludo,
OK, here's my next attempt at a solution for this problem. :-)
Compared to the previous stack calibration patch/approach, the main
points of this one are that
- it uses a much larger amount of executed code to calibrate stack
usage: specifically, all the code involved in starting up a standard
debug-mode REPL
- it focusses on the problem of getting `make check' to pass (when it
should do so)
- it does not modify the value or meaning of the default, C-coded stack limit
- it doesn't require building the whole of Guile twice!
I'm only looking at this stage for general thoughts; if you think this
approach looks good, I will still need to
- incorporate a "-l ../libguile/stack-limit-calibration.scm" into the
running of test-suite/tests/*
- do ChangeLogs, docs and NEWS.
Please let me know what you think.
Neil
0001-Stack-calibration-mark-2.patch
Description: Text Data
- Re: Stack calibration, Andy Wingo, 2008/10/02
- Re: Stack calibration, Neil Jerram, 2008/10/02
- Re: Stack calibration, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/10/06
- Re: Stack calibration, Neil Jerram, 2008/10/06
- Re: Stack calibration,
Neil Jerram <=
- Re: Stack calibration, Greg Troxel, 2008/10/10
- Re: Stack calibration, Neil Jerram, 2008/10/10
- Re: Stack calibration, Greg Troxel, 2008/10/10
- Re: Stack calibration, Neil Jerram, 2008/10/10
- Re: Stack calibration, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/10/11
- Re: Stack calibration, Neil Jerram, 2008/10/12
- Re: Stack calibration, Neil Jerram, 2008/10/12
- Re: Stack calibration, Neil Jerram, 2008/10/13
- Re: Stack calibration, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/10/14
- Re: Stack calibration, Neil Jerram, 2008/10/17