[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: r6rs libraries, round two
|
From: |
Neil Jerram |
|
Subject: |
Re: r6rs libraries, round two |
|
Date: |
Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:36:02 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> This is IMO a terrific part of version handling in R6 modules. What
> will it mean for a 2009 program to import `(rnrs base)' when R27RS is
> released?
By `terrific' do you mean good or bad? Normally terrific means good,
and `terrible' means bad, and I suspect you meant `terrible'.
Neil
- Re: r6rs libraries, round two, Andy Wingo, 2009/06/01
- Re: r6rs libraries, round two, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/06/01
- Re: r6rs libraries, round two,
Neil Jerram <=
- Re: r6rs libraries, round two, Julian Graham, 2009/06/27
- Re: r6rs libraries, round two, Andy Wingo, 2009/06/28
- Re: r6rs libraries, round two, Julian Graham, 2009/06/29
- Re: r6rs libraries, round two, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/06/29