[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: r6rs libraries, round two
From: |
Julian Graham |
Subject: |
Re: r6rs libraries, round two |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:02:42 -0400 |
Hi Andy,
> Back to your question though, what did you think about my symlink
> solution[1]?
>
> [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/8585
It's fine, although any length suffix of a version specifier can be
omitted in the case of a match -- that is, you can do without the
version altogether, or you can just partially specify a version; in
both cases, the system needs to find a matching version for you.
Would the symlinking strategy you describe happen at every node in the
directory tree of versions for a particular library?
E.g., let's say you've got version 1.2.3 of R6RS library `(foo bar)'
installed. Does the installation directory look like:
foo/1/2/3/bar.scm
foo/1/2/bar.default -> foo/1/2/3/bar.scm
foo/1/bar.default -> foo/1/2/3/bar.scm
foo/bar.default -> foo/1/2/3/bar.scm
Regards,
Julian
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: r6rs libraries, round two,
Julian Graham <=