[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compiling with -DSCM_DEBUG=1
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: compiling with -DSCM_DEBUG=1 |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:27:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
On Mon 16 Nov 2009 07:08, Ken Raeburn <address@hidden> writes:
> On Nov 15, 2009, at 17:25, Neil Jerram wrote:
>> Ken Raeburn <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Here's my revised patch. I've simplified the check, and it still
>>> passes the tests (except the options tests that were just committed
>>> with a log message indicating that they don't pass) and doesn't crash
>>> under SCM_DEBUG.
>>
>> Thanks. The revised patch looks correct to me, so please commit it.
>
> Andy's just changed a bunch of stuff affecting these files; I've
> remerged my changes, but I'm not sure if they're needed any more. I'll
> try to examine this further tomorrow.
Sorry about that. There is only one copy of that code now, and it is in
goops.c. I don't think I've changed the contents of that code though.
Regards,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- Re: compiling with -DSCM_DEBUG=1, Andy Wingo, 2009/11/14
- Re: compiling with -DSCM_DEBUG=1, Neil Jerram, 2009/11/14
- Re: compiling with -DSCM_DEBUG=1, Ken Raeburn, 2009/11/14
- Re: compiling with -DSCM_DEBUG=1, Ken Raeburn, 2009/11/14
- Re: compiling with -DSCM_DEBUG=1, Neil Jerram, 2009/11/15
- Re: compiling with -DSCM_DEBUG=1, Ken Raeburn, 2009/11/16
- Re: compiling with -DSCM_DEBUG=1,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: compiling with -DSCM_DEBUG=1, Ken Raeburn, 2009/11/16
- Re: compiling with -DSCM_DEBUG=1, Neil Jerram, 2009/11/16
- Re: compiling with -DSCM_DEBUG=1, Neil Jerram, 2009/11/15