[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:10:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hey!
Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue 20 Jul 2010 18:35, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> I would prefer not to enshrine a "regular / debug" split again though. I
>>> guess that's what really bothers me. It's especially egregious if you
>>> can't switch at runtime.
>>
>> The split survived! :-)
>>
>> $ guile -c 'sdf'
>> ERROR: In procedure catch-closure:
>> ERROR: Unbound variable: sdf
>>
>> $ guile --debug -c 'sdf'
>> Backtrace:
> [...]
>
> Hehe. That, to me, is a bug ;-) What do you think about always giving
> backtraces for uncaught errors?
I’m all for it!
Ludo’.
- SRFI-1 in Scheme, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/07/12
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Andy Wingo, 2010/07/13
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/07/13
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Andy Wingo, 2010/07/13
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/07/13
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Andy Wingo, 2010/07/14
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/07/15
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Andy Wingo, 2010/07/19
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/07/20
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Andy Wingo, 2010/07/20
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Andy Wingo, 2010/07/20