[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FOL
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: FOL |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:09:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Stefan Israelsson Tampe <address@hidden> writes:
>> > For setting up the error reporting I used a pdf
>> > describing the syntax-parse macro
>> >
>> > http://www.ccs.neu.edu/scheme/pubs/icfp10-cf.pdf
>>
>> Yeah, that seems like an improvement in terms of error detection and
>> error reporting (better than “source expression failed to match any
>> pattern”...).
>>
>> However, I don’t like the aesthetics: keywords, and, worse, type
>> annotations embedded in identifiers.
>
> The syntax can be fixed, any ideas?
No, but I think that having a consensual syntax among Schemers may be
more sustainable than rolling our own macro system. :-)
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- FOL, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2010/09/16
- Re: FOL, Andy Wingo, 2010/09/16
- Re: FOL, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/09/16
- Re: FOL, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2010/09/16
- Re: FOL,
Ludovic Courtès <=